In the Navy Estimates presented to the House of Commons in March 1910 five armoured vessels were announced for the coming financial year which began on 1 April and ended on 31 March 1911. Four of these armoured vessels would form the Royal Navy’s King George V class of battleship. One of these, eventually named Audacious, was laid down at Cammell, Laird & Co.’s yard at Birkenhead on 23 March 1911, a week before the next Admiralty financial year began. The reason for laying a ship down so late in the financial year was clear: as Reginald McKenna put it in presenting the 1909 estimates, ‘An obvious effect of this system is to postpone for some two years a large part of the financial burdens of the programme to which the ships belong.’ I decided to look at how this worked, using the Dockyard Expense Accounts:
| Financial Year | Sum |
| 1910-1911 | £48,157 |
| 1911-1912 | £624,756 |
| 1912-1913 | £771,566 |
| 1913-1914 | £340,590 |
| Total | £1,785,069 |
The ship was completed on 15 October, 1913. Incidental expenses over the course of her construction amounted to £31,746, and along with the total of £1,785,069 were considered her first cost of £1,816,315. Material connected to her armament accounted for £436,911, or 24% of the cost.
It is not known where on earth R. A. Burt got his total of £1,918,813, quoted by Wikipedia, from.
A Blog on the Ocean Wave 
Parkes gives a total of about 1,960,000 for each of the ships in the class. Another reason why I should start deleting cost data from the British capital ships in Wikipedia. Nice to see you posting a bit more often here.
LikeLiked by 1 person